News

 

The Patawomeck Tribe of Virginia sent a cease and desist letter after Stafford County Historical Society members questioned the tribe's authenticity.

Rick and Jerilynn MacGregor sent the letter to the tribe and the Stafford County Board of Supervisors in September 2022, questioning the legitimacy of the tribe, claiming that there is no documentation supporting the Patawomeck as a tribe indigenous to the region.

The letter was titled "Where is the Patawomeck Indian Tribe of Virginia Inc. Recognition Does Not Equal Legitimacy September 2022".

The tribe was granted recognition as a state-recognized tribe in 2010 by the Virginia General Assembly.

"The process through which the PITV obtained their state recognition reminds us of the little story of Everybody, Somebody, Anybody, and Nobody," states the MacGregors in their letter. "Over the last 15 years or so, everybody assumed that somebody had done their "due diligence" to confirm the accuracy of the historical narrative espoused by the IPTV. From all we've seen thus far, nobody did."

The MacGregors also called into question the process in which the tribe received recognition through the Virginia General Assembly in Richmond rather than through the Virginia Council on Indians, which the tribe had applied to the council for recognition twice and was denied both times.

Rick MacGregor serves as the Stafford Historical Society President, while Jerilynn MacGregor serves as its secretary. The group is a non-profit organization dating back to 1965, charged with the historical education and preservation of Stafford County.

"We're upset about this. The tribe has tried to foster goodwill and provide education about the history of the Patawomeck," said Charlie Payne Jr., the tribe's lawyer. "The MacGregors have been invited to discuss the issue with the tribe but have declined the offer, this matter was settled back in 2010 by the General Assembly and we have historians that have looked over the evidence and support the tribe."

The tribe demanded the MacGregors stop the "dissemination of false and misleading information about the tribe" and threatened legal civil action and penalties for failure to comply.

The couple had been invited to talk to the Patawomeck regarding their questions as recently as May 2022 but declined the offer, said Payne. The lawyer also shared letters from historians at both the College of William and Mary in Williamsburg and American University in Washington D.C. that support the tribe's standing of legitimacy and dispute the claims of lack of documentation.

The letters from the college's historians, Danielle Moretti-Langholtz and Buck Woodard, respectively, show that documentation on the tribe exists through recorded interviews with tribe members who gave oral histories as well as reports from neighboring tribes such as the Pamunkey.

The letters also dispute the claims of legitimacy of Virginia tribes, especially under the auspices of the Virginia Council on Indians. Moretti-Langholtz writes in her letter that the council was never mandated to draw up criteria for recognition, to which no such standards were ever agreed upon.

Moretti-Langholtz sat on the council when she was appointed by then Governor Mark Warner in 203 and served until 2006. Moretti-Langholtz also mentioned that the council had been recently reconvened in Richmond to set up such criteria.

In June 2019, the Stafford County Board of Supervisors reached a lease deal with the Patawomeck Tribe to lease a part of Duff Green Park to build a cultural center and museum opened in the Summer 2022. The county also paid for improvements to the area, which included renovations for the Duff House estimated to cost $109,000 and various improvements to paths, roads, and gardens, which, combined with the upgrades, cost $334,000.

"The heritage and lineage of the tribe are well noted and recognized by the commonwealth and professors from noted universities. It's unfortunate that instead of working to unite Stafford in its diversity, some are choosing to be divisive," said George Washington District Supervisor Tom Coen.

According to the tribe, The Patawomeck tribe of Virginia Indians is based in Stafford County, along the Potomac River (Patawomeck is another spelling of Potomac). It is one of Virginia's 11 recognized Native American tribes.

This article is FREE to read. Please Sign In or Create a FREE Account. Thank you.


News

The Stafford County Board of Supervisors held off on sending a letter to the Board of Local and Regional Jails that would express concerns about an ongoing study into inmate fees.

Under review fees to a telephone, visitation systems, and the cost inmates incur when purchasing items or services from jail commissaries.

According to the Rappahanock Regional Jail, inmates can pay for these goods and services via accounts set up for inmates, where family members and friends can deposit funds.

The Rappahannock Regional Jail Board Authority asked the Stafford County Board of Supervisors to send a letter outlining concerns regarding the study, which is looking into reducing or eliminating fees.

However, the Stafford County Board of Supervisors decided to hold off on sending the letter as some members were concerned about taking a particular position.

Aquia District Supervisor Monica Gary was concerned about its impact on residents with family members under incarceration and the economic effects it would have on them. Gary and Garrisonville District Supervisor Pamela Yueng felt that the letter was unfinished. To Yeung, the letter also seemed as though the Board of Supervisors opposed the study's recommendations.

"I'm not going to blindly send a letter to the board without knowing what the recommendations are," said Yeung.

The jail board authority believes that its general fund would be reduced, and the costs of any potential reductions would have to be made up by member localities of the authority, including Stafford.

Stafford, Fredericksburg, Spotsylvania, and King George are the jurisdictions that have a seat on the jail authority.

The work group performing the study is scheduled to report its findings and recommendations to the Chairman of the House Committee on Rehabilitation and the Senate Committee on Rehabilitation and Social Services in the Virginia General Assembly on December 1, 2022.

The jail board esitmates that the cuts in any of these services or programs could result in a reduction of $2,727,525 from its general fund and its commissary purchase revenue by $625,576. The regional jail would also be required to pay for goods and services that would have been covered by inmate purchase revenues which would amount to $801,159.

The Rappahannock Regional Jail currently operates with a $43 million annual budget which comes from funding from its member localities.

The letter will be brought back as unfinished business at the board's next meeting on October 4, along with a summation of possible impacts of the jail.

This article is FREE to read. Please Sign In or Create a FREE Account. Thank you.


News

Updated September 30, 2022 -- Stafford County wants to buy more land for environmental preservation.

The plan to add 152 acres of land to the county's Purchase of Development Rights program was discussed at a recent meeting of the county's Community and Economic Development Committee meeting.

The county is considering two parcels called the Jones and Moore properties. The Jones property is 70 acres, while the Moore property is 82.

Both parcels sit in the rural George Washington District, in the southeast portion of the county. The recommendation to acquire these lands was made in January 2018 by the county's Agriculture and Land Conservation Committee.

According to its website, the program enables Stafford County to acquire voluntary conservation easements given voluntarily by property owners to ensure that local resources are protected and used efficiently. The program already has 1,035 acres of local land under its auspices.

The parcels' inclusion in the program would also limit any further residential development on the property.

According to the county spokeswoman Shannon Eubanks, the properties would be acquired to preserve prime agricultural soils, farmland, forestland, and other significant natural resources.

The county would pay $362,500 for both pieces of land. The Jones parcel will cost $152,500, while the Moore parcel will cost $200,000.

Once a government buys property through a purchase of development rights program, the property owner may continue to live and farm on the land or sell it. However, the owner may never build on the property.

The county has applied for funding through the Virginia Land Conservation Foundation and the U.S. Department of Agriculture. It will also use its funds for costs such as appraisal and closing fees. According to county documents, that revenue will need to be appropriated from Roll Back Tax revenue, which has been earmarked for the land purchase.

Stafford County is currently accepting new submissions for the program. New applicants have until September 30 to apply for the program.

The county's acquisition of the parcels is currently in progress and is expected to be completed by December 2022.

*This story has been corrected. 

This article is FREE to read. Please Sign In or Create a FREE Account. Thank you.


Business
[caption id="attachment_182526" align="aligncenter" width="600"] Ribbon cutting ceremony at Stafford Regional Airport [Photo: Rick Horner][/caption]

After 15 years of planning and negotiation, Stafford Regional Airport has completed its goal of extending its runway by 1,000 feet.

The airport held a ceremony in honor of the extension, which included the flight of a blue Boeing-Stearman Model 75 biplane, the first plane that flew from and touched down on the newly extended runway.

The ceremony included former and current members of its authority and various members of the Stafford County government and its board of supervisors.

"It's a monumental day. There are so many people that were involved in getting this project going. We had great leadership, and it was a big collaboration between the municipalities and the FAA on the state and national levels. It's a great combination of everyone coming together to see this happen." said John Eaves, the current chairman of the Airport Authority.

The goal of the extension, according to both Eaves and other members of the authority, was to allow for bigger planes to use the airport. The 1,000-foot extension will also lead to more fuel sales and a greater probability of economic development in the area due to the newly extended, now 6,000-foot runway.

The funding for the extension came from the Federal Aviation Administration, which gave $5.5 million to the airport in July 2021. That funding came from a larger pot of $14 million of transportation funding dedicated to Virginia airports. Construction on the extension would begin in June 2022 and finish in early September.

"We're very excited that the runway extension is complete and that the FAA was phenomenal in this since they paid for the entire expansion. This did not cost our taxpayers in Stafford County any money," said Falmouth District Supervisor Meg Bohmke.

Potomac Local News also spoke to Hank Schapenberg, who was also present at the ceremony and performed the ribbon-cutting duties. Scharfenberg has been a part of the Airport Authority since 2007 and was a vocal proponent of the runway extension when people thought, as Scharpenberg himself puts it "touching the third rail" on the matter.

"The airport can now function as a true economic driver, it can get businessmen in here from either the West Coast or Europe, take off again, and we know that's going to bring economic development," said Scharpenberg.

The next move for the airport, according to Schapenberg adding more T-hangers to house more planes. The airport also wants to pursue more corporate clients willing to park their aircraft at the airport.

The Stafford Regional Airport sits at 90 Aviation Way in Stafford, just off Centreport Parkway.

This article is FREE to read. Please Sign In or Create a FREE Account. Thank you.


News

A number of county residents showed support for local school custodians as the Stafford County Public School system cuts ties with contractor ABM.

This article is FREE to read. Please Sign In or Create a FREE Account. Thank you.


News

Virginia Attorney General Miyares comes to Prince William County for a meeting on human trafficking.

This article is FREE to read. Please Sign In or Create a FREE Account. Thank you.


News
[caption id="attachment_181387" align="aligncenter" width="600"] Interstate 95 over the Rappahannock River in Fredericksburg [Photo: VDOT][/caption]

The Stafford County Board of Supervisors has expressed interest in researching a Rappahannock Crossing Parkway to alleviate traffic Interstate 95 corridor.

The Board approved a letter to the Fredericksburg Area Metropolitan Planning Organization requesting that it research options for a new bridge over the Rappahannock River, west of I-95. The Board also asked FAMPO to consider fiscal impacts, potential funding opportunities, route options, and effects on existing road networks.

The Board asked FAMPO to keep it and other localities informed of any developments in its research. Fredericksburg bypass studies were done in 2013 and 2019. Officials balked when a proposed road came too close to existing neighborhoods.

The Board chose "research" instead of "study," which had been used in a previous draft. Falmouth District Supervisor Meg Bohmke said "study" tends to have additional strings, such as federal and state funding. According to Bohmke, using the word "research" would give the FAMPO more flexibility.

FAMPO Director Ian Hollis was at the meeting to answer questions. Griffis-Widewater District Supervisor Tinesha Allen asked what the difference would be between research options now and previous studies.

Hollis said that previous studies had studied a bridge rather than the viability of many potential solutions. As of late, FAMPO's focus has been on rail and transit solutions, getting people out of cars and onto public transportation. Hollis said new methods of data collection could aid in the research, such as streetlight data which can map the origin and destinations of commuters; this method was not available for the previous studies.

Hollis also mentioned that there had been renewed calls for an outer-connector road network that could potentially alleviate traffic issues in the Stafford/Fredericksburg area corridor.

FAMPO's Citizen Citizen Transportation Advisory group's August meeting discussed the viability of an outer connector, which would include an eastern connector road from Stafford to Spotsylvania and a western connector through Culpeper and Orange counties.

Following that discussion, a push by Stafford Supervisors led  Henry Scharbenberg, the group's chairman, to be booted from the panel. Scharpenburg pushed the idea of an outer connector without support from Supervisors, knowing an outer-connector road is not in the county's long-range transportation plan, Supervisors told Potomac Local News. 

Culpeper and Orange are not FAMPO members and would need to join for the project to be viable, said Hollis.

During the meeting, Bohmke said that she was not in favor of an outer connector for fear of the possibility of urban sprawl.

Another concern from Allen and George Washington District Supervisor Tom Coen was a lack of communication between the organization and the county regarding matters on the connector.

Coen expressed concern that officials in nearby Fredericksburg seemed to know more about the issue than the county did and stressed that they should be kept in the loop if they were to be involved in such a project.

The Board approved the letter with a vote of 4-2-1. Allen abstained from the vote.

This article is FREE to read. Please Sign In or Create a FREE Account. Thank you.


News

The costs have come for a half-day holiday in Stafford County.

Stafford Supervisors closed the county government from 12:30 to 4:30 p.m. Friday, August 19, so county employees could attend the Stafford Warriors baseball game at Virginia Credit Union Stadium in Fredericksburg. Students from all five county high schools were on the team that played and lost a Babe Ruth World Series League championship game that day.

The county abruptly announced the closure on Thursday, August 18. About 100 of the county's 400 government employees who were expected to attend showed up. Other essential personnel, like public safety crews, remained on duty.

Under the county's holiday leave policy, some county employees who work during holidays and during other times when the local government closes for inclement weather or, in this case, a local baseball team playing in the championships are paid bonus overtime.

Overall, it cost $97,500 in bonus pay to close the county government on August 19. On Tuesday, September 6, the Board of Supervisors agreed to pay the special half-day compensation.

Some Board of Supervisors members were unhappy with the last-minute notice of the game.

"We already had given employees a floating holiday which they could have used instead of giving them another day," said Garrisonville District Supervisor Pamela Yeung. "I'm not against people going out to see their kids play but not at the expense of the community. I got a lot of emails about closing the offices. Personally, I thought it was fiscally irresponsible on our part to do that."

Fiscal responsibility was also a concern of Griffis-Widewater District Supervisor Tinesha Allen when she asked how much overtime pay employees who worked during the closure would receive.

"I didn't support this because I don't think this is a good usage of tax dollars, and also, it wouldn't set a good precedent," said Allen. "Would we be required to allow time off for an employee's child's game? I think this could have been put to better use."

Aquia District Supervisor Monica Gary supported the half-day closure and paying holiday pay, remarking that events of this nature are standard practice with the Federal Government and can help foster good relationships and retention of employees.

However, Gary said tweaks should be made to avoid a last-minute situation in the future. "I wish it hadn't been so politicized and argued that we wanted to do something nice for our staff," said Gary.

Falmouth District Supervisor Meg Bohmke also expressed her support for the event but was not pleased with the last-minute nature of the event. Bohmke disapproved of all county services being closed and particularly named the Commissioner of the Revenue and the Treasurer's offices.

"We had people walk in wanting to use those offices and couldn't because they were closed, and I was not happy about that," said Bohmke.

George Washington District Supervisor Tom Coen supported paying overtime, expressed fiscal concerns about the bonuses, and said that not knowing the budgetary impact was troubling.

"All of our employees are dealing with the pressures such as inflation and COVID. Existing staff are taking on other people's work to meet the needs of the community," said Coen. "I felt we should do something to recognize that."

Coen would also voice concern about the last-minute nature of the event and asked if a policy could be made to avoid the issue in the future when an event such as this happens again.

Rock Hill District Supervisor and Board Chair Crystal Vanuch supported the bonuses since, according to her, there had been no team-building exercises or events for county employees since early 2020. Vanuch cited the work of county employees, particularly first responders, utilities, and the Board, who she felt deserved the bonuses and half-day for their work.

"Taxpayers just paid 58 cents so our first responders can have a $200 bonus for one day, "I think this is a good investment," said Vanuch.

On the general government side, the county incurred $23,770 in bonus costs, while the county's public safety departments incurred $73,800 in bonus costs.

The Board of Supervisors would approve the bonuses with a 4-3 vote. Bohmke voted to approve the motion, and Vanuch seconded. Yeung, Allen, and Hartwood District Supervisor Darrell English voted against paying the holiday bonuses. 

This article is FREE to read. Please Sign In or Create a FREE Account. Thank you.


News

Stafford County will partner with the U.S. Geological Survey to map hydrological features in the area.

This article is exclusively for our Locals Only members. Please Sign In or upgrade to become a Locals Only Member today!

Your support helps us continue delivering more in-depth community news that matters to you. Thank you.


Business
[caption id="attachment_142451" align="aligncenter" width="600"] The City of Fredericksburg City Hall building.[/caption]

The Fredericksburg City Council approved a study to help evaluate new projects developed by the city's Planning Commission.

A Capital Impacts Study developed by TischlerBise, a fiscal, economic, and planning consulting firm based in Bethesda, Md., will provide a basis to evaluate cash proffers and conditions for schools and emergency services.

According to the Realtors Association of Richmond website, cash proffers are voluntary home fees on home construction paid by the building firm in the development process and only apply to developments requiring rezoning.

Such fees are used to address impacts created by new developments. Virginia is the only state in the United States that uses this method.

The study uses the place of residence of current students to predict the unit type which would be occupied by students in new housing developments for school impacts.

Using real estate records provided by Fredericksburg, the study also identified the number of bedrooms for each residence's single-family attached and detached units. Those records didn't provide data on the number of bedrooms for multifamily units.

The study used 911 call data to determine the impact on the city's emergency services.

Information provided by Fredericksburg gave examples of how much of a cash proffer could be obtained through this metric. One example was the 60-acre, 375 multifamily unit Neon development project on Gordon Shelton Boulevard. Under the new metric, Fredericksburg could have gained cash proffers of $5.5 million.

The study also measured the impact of those developments on city services. One example found that a three-bedroom single-family home could impact $12,014. The estimate would be $11,239 for public schools and $721 for Fire and Emergency Medical service impacts.

Neon is a development presented to the city's Technical Review Committee by the Silver Company, which is also planning to have its first Neon development in Charlotte, N.C.

The study did go through revisions during its process through the city's Planning Commission. According to city documents, one particular issue was brought up by Charlie Payne, a local land use attorney of the law firm Hirschler-Fleischer. Payne's observations led to the removal of references that would have allowed the study to be used to create conditions for special-use permits, which Payne concluded would have a chilling effect on development in Fredericksburg.

The Virginia code does not explicitly enable cash proffers associated with special-use permit applications, so that language was removed in favor of focusing on the context of rezoning with associated proffers.

The study was originally commissioned by Fredericksburg to TischlerBise but was suspended in 2016. The study resumed in 2021.

Meanwhile, the Virginia General Assembly passed a proffer bill in 2016, which strictly limited any proffer negotiations between localities and developers. Lawmakers revised the bill in 2019 to allow for such talks.

At-Large Councilmember Jon Gerlach would ultimately vote to approve the study because the policy would be reviewed and updated annually. Gerlach voiced his concern that an approach based on this study would potentially harm no-bedroom homes such as studio and junior apartments.

"In the next update, I would like to look at how we could encourage smaller studio, junior, zero bedroom apartments," said Gerlach. "This seems to discourage really small dwellings in multifamily, mixed-use dwellings. I'd like to dig into that at the next iteration."

Ward 3 Councilmember Tim Duffy also approved the study to demonstrate what Fredericksburg would do in these rezoning situations.

"What I really like about this impact study is that it lays out for everybody to see our version of what impacts of development are," said Duffy. "As people come with projects, they can come and look at that, and they can tell us if we're right or wrong, and there can be a negotiation over what impacts are and what proffers could be."

The city council unanimously adopted the study and sent it back down to the Planning Commission, where it will be used to create guidelines for the city's policy regarding cash proffers for rezoning development projects.

This article is exclusively for our Locals Only members. Please Sign In or upgrade to become a Locals Only Member today!

Your support helps us continue delivering more in-depth community news that matters to you. Thank you.


View More Stories